Elitism doesn't have anything to do with money.
Senator Obama could be penniless and on the streets and he would still be an elitist. Bill Clinton - as has been pointed out by every pundit in America - earned $109 million over the last eight years and he could walk into a Krispy Kreme tomorrow and comfortably eat glazed donuts with a bunch of Bubbas. Hillary? Well, she can't bowl worth a damn but I was surprised at the relish with which she throws back a beer and I've never doubted that in private she's one helluva a broad.
Speaking today on David Gregory's new CNBC show, Rachel Maddow - whom I find to be knowledgeable and funny - said this about suggestions that Senator Barack Obama is an elitist: "...ultimately though you've got three senators running against each other, two of them are fixtures in Washington, one of them's an outsider, it's John Sidney McCain the Third versus Hillary "$109 million dollars" Rodham Clinton and they're going to try to protray mister single mom as the elitist."
Later on Kudlow & Company (yes, I know but you have to sample everything) Keith Boykin, editor of The Voice, commented: "When I hear John McCain, Hillary Clinton and other people calling Barack Obama an elitist, I think it's a little like the gold plated pot calling the kettle black. The truth is...Barack Obama is a community organizer from the south side of Chicago who's still paying off, just finished paying off, his student loans so y'know I think it's really outrageous to try to pretend that he's something he's not."
I wasn't familiar with Mr. Boykin's bio until today but he attended Harvard Law with Senator Obama and worked as a special assistant to President Clinton, so obviously he has a better handle on them personally than I do; however, I think both Ms. Maddow and Mr. Boykin are speaking from a fundamentally flawed premise: that elitism derives mainly from one's financial resources.
I'm going to take a brief moment away from the central thought of my post to point out that Senator Obama is doing pretty well rolling up the big bucks; if he only just now finished paying off his student loans then he may have done so with a portion of his $1.9 million book advance. Pretty paltry when talking about the sixty gazillion billion million dollars the Clintons have made since I started writing this post but a nice little number nonetheless. Check back with the couple eight years after the presidency they both presume will be theirs. They may no longer be, as Mrs. Obama characterizes them, "fresh and open and fearless and bold" but I bet they will be rich, way rich, Bill and Hillary rich. More power to them, the presidency is a hard job (lots of perks, Air Force One and all that, but still hard) and hazardous, I don't begrudge them a penny of any future earnings. To be honest, I voted for Jimmy Carter and he is undoubtably the former President who has best upheld the idea of what a former President should be - but he's starting to get on my nerves, just a little, not much, but just a little.
If I've heard one comentator (and I have), I've heard a covey of commentators, eliminate Senator Obama from being an elitist because he was brought up by a single mother, because he fit so well into so many diverse cultural settings, because he was a community organizer from South Chicago (and, hey, lest we forget Michelle shops at Target; I thought I recognized her clothes). None of these things prevents one from being an elitist. Elitism - to me - is aspirational not financial.
Another break here - grab a beer if you like - there is nothing inherently wrong with aspiring to be elite. The Green Berets are an elite fighting force, the Colts are an elite football team. One would hope that all of our children have the chance to attend an elite school, that all of our cancer patients have the ability to receive care at an elite hospital. It is when striving to be elite means demeaning others that it turns into elitism. It is when individuals begin to think that enjoying certain activities either makes one elite or keeps one from being elite, that the word takes on an edge. It's also when you drop the "e" and add "ism".
There are elitists living in trailer parks. (I have nothing against trailer parks, in fact, I aspire to live in a mobile home). There are unemployed elitists living in blue collar neighborhoods. There are elitists shopping in Target (but probably not K-Mart or Wal-Mart). Conversely, there are Bubbas living in San Francisco and at least one for sure lives in Chappaqua, New York.
Elitism, like Bubba-ism, is a state of mind.
It may take the form of constantly telling others how lucky they are to have a person joining them down there in the muck.
"Barack is one of the smartest people you will ever encounter who will deign to enter this messy thing called politics." - Michelle Obama
It may take the form of take the form of telling mothers who have neither the money to pay for extracurricular lessons for their children nor the time to take them to those lessons if they could afford them that you spend thousands annually making sure your children have them.
“We spend between the two kids, on extracurriculars outside the classroom, we’re spending about $10,000 a year on piano and dance and sports supplements. And summer programs… Do you know what summer camp costs?” - Michelle Obama
Or, it may take the form of getting people to write checks to your campaign by making derisive comments about people half a continent away.





I'm so glad someone is finally pointing out that being elitist doesn't require being super-rich! I used to like Rachel Maddow, but that type of disingenuous comment spoken to conform to the "Thou Shalt Not Criticize Our Savior Obama" meme has caused me to tune out Air America and MSNBC. (C'mon, Rachel! You understand the meaning of "elitism.")
As a disclaimer: Neither Clinton or Obama were my first, second or third choices in the Democratic Primary. I will vote for the chosen candidate. However, I find Obama supporters to be pushy and obnoxious (and dishonest).
As a former San Franciscan, who happily relocated to flyover country, I probably know some of the people at that fundraiser. The irritating thing about Obama's comments was not so much the use of the word "bitter" or "cling," it was that, once again, this man who claims to be the candidate who will bring us all together, is dividing us by class and culture. The thought of his explanation of "those" people to the smug, self-satisfied and righteous Californians I lived with, makes me seethe.
From what I've read about the candidate's background, Obama was raised by doting grandparents and an intelligent and educated single mother who knew enough to get her son a scholarship to an expensive and prestigious private school in Hawaii. Chances are, he grew up feeling pretty special. He was also treated as "special" by mentors in Chicago within the African-American community and groomed to move into the political arena.
McCain comes from a high-achieving military family.
Clinton is the only candidate that actually has "normal" middle-class roots. That doesn't make her more or less qualified to be President, but it does likely mean that she understands more about working and middle-class Americans than either Obama or McCain.
I would like to see Obama and his wife lose their air of preciousness, but only if they can do it honestly by opening their minds and hearts to the Americans they clearly consider "them."
Reply to this
Sara, thanks for your comment. It's good to have a view point from someone who has lived in SF and now lives in MN.
I am in total agreement with your remarks about the kind of home in which BO was raised. As a single mother who raised a son with the help of my parents, it's getting a little old to hear people say he was raised by a "single mother" as though that automatically means his childhood was somehow deprived.
HRC is my candidate and I am really struggling with the idea of voting for Senator Obama. Some of his supporters are way beyond rude when dealing with Hillary-ites, more so than many of the Republicans I knew in TN. I am still hoping for some Obama moment that will give me an insight into what his supporters see in him. I know his is incredibly smart, well educated, has some excellent stands on the issues but I'm not sure all of those things can overcome his arrogance. We don't need another eight years under the leadership of a person who thinks he was destined to be president.
I will hope with you that the Obamas lose - in your right on phrase - "their air of preciousness."
Reply to this