Hillary Clinton can't be nominated and Barack Obama can't be elected.


John McCain - for whom I have enormous respect as a person - will leave a standing force in harm's way in Iraq for the forseeable future.  Our economic system has become too large and - for the common man and woman, which includes most members of Congress - too complicated to understand, much less regulate.  People - while espousing the noblest of goals - appear to be guided by an insatiable greed when those lofty goals come into conflict with their short term personal desires.  It's enough to make an old hippie give up recycling and sit out the coming general election.

I recycle aluminum, plastic, newspapers, whatever I can, always have.  I also hang onto things long beyond their usefulness and then part with them with great reluctance, being one of those people who comes to feel that even the lowliest household item has somehow become imbued with a personality.  So, the other night when I threw everything in sight out in one big pile of garbage, none into the recycling bins I knew some sinister force was at work.  While I am now back on course, my little binge of trashiness bespeaks a larger inner battle I'm fighting these days: am I a good Democratic foot soldier or is it time to rethink the politics of my life from the bottom up? 

Let me put it baldly.  I don't think I can vote for Senator Obama.  His foreign policy seems naive, his economic policy untutored.  He preaches the politics of inclusion while speaking disdainfully and dismissively of a large portion of the electorate.  I don't give a damn about the slender threads which tie him to a member of the Weather Underground but I continue to be disturbed by his decision to sit in a pew for twenty years and listen to racist rhetoric.  Senator Obama "teaches" us when he should be engaging us.  He speaks of transforming us with little regard to how much we have already transformed ourselves.  There is not a question about anything he has said or done that Senator Obama can't answer with a little rhetorical misdirection.  All of that being said, Senator Obama will most likely - hell, will most probably - be the Democratic nominee and even if Hillary Clinton should be on the bottom half of the ticket, I just can't go there.

For me, a Democratic Party led by Senator Obama and Howard Dean becomes the Democratic Party that all my Republican friends have always told me it was: arrogant, elitist, self-rigteous and smug - a party from which I am increasingly estranged.  Should Senator Obama be elected - and I don't think he can be once the Republican underbelly sound bites him in the ass - his policies would be significantly different from those of the current administration but his sense of predestination would be exactly the same.  I may have to live under another eight years of an administation that thinks a dove came down from the heavens and landed on its shoulder, but I don't have to vote for it.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 
Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 4/18/2008 11:12 AM EJHill wrote:
    The interesting thing about this election is just how estranged BOTH candidates will be from people who should be considered their base. The Dems are going to be running an undistinguished and unproven junior senator who's main political skill seems to be ducking responsibility (from 'present' votes to agreeing with his pastor right up to the point of liability) and the Republicans are nominating a man who flirted with leaving the GOP, is responsible for a major reduction in free speech rights (McCain-Feingold) and who's star speaker at his convention will probably be the 2000 Democratic VP nominee.

    The two major political parties are corrupt to the core. An independent presidential candidate is not the answer (imagine Jesse Ventura's disaster in Minnesota expanded to a national scale.)
    I am afraid there needs to be a new party or parties dedicated to common sense and constitutional ideas instead of vote buying.
    Reply to this
    1. 4/19/2008 12:56 PM Observer wrote:
      Thanks for your thoughtful comments.

      I've been thinking along the same lines party wise, at the moment neither seems to hold much allure for me.
      Reply to this
  • 4/19/2008 6:33 PM j9zig wrote:
    "rhetorical misdirection" - Exactly! Calls any uncomfortable question a "diversion". As a Republican who switched parties so I can vote for Hillary Clinton in the PA primary, I agree with your other Republican friends comments about the Dems.

    I am voting for Hillary because Barry Obama is basically a Marxist, who while saying "unity" has only succeeded in disuniting the Dem Party. If the Dems nominate him, I hope it is the end of the party as we know it.

    Perhaps this primary will open up the chance for a 3rd party, though I may just be dreaming.
    Reply to this
    1. 4/21/2008 9:03 AM Observer wrote:
      Thank you for both of your comments.

      While I'm not sure I would go so far as to call Senator Obama's comments Marxist they are certainly of the sort that make the Dems appear to be ignorant of middle class American and arrogant toward and disdainful of a large portion of the American electorate.

      I agree that an Obama nomination will almost certainly leave the Dems wandering in the presidential wilderness for another four years and may well engender a strong third party assault in 2012.

      The vote tomorrow in PA should be interesting and may well decide the nominee.


      Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.