Yesterday and today as word of the - at last count - $700 billion
plan for the Government to buy mortgage backed securities began to be released to the public, the story of how Hank and Ben scared the living daylights out of the congressional leadership was also being told. Well, there are a few things that scare the living daylights out of me as well. For instance, how is it that the men and women of the House and Senate (who will now be called upon to pass legislation authorizing the plan) did not realize - until told by H&B on Thursday - that the situation was so dire? Hell, I had a friend telling me on Tuesday that he felt we were headed for a Depression style Crash.
And isn't it a touch scary that these same folks are going to be called upon to write a bill that will effectively change the face of America's financial institutions and that they're going to do it over the weekend? During Senate hearings where H&B testify, most of these esteemed elected officials can't come up with questions more sophisticated than the ones I would ask. Charlie Rangel has admitted that he didn't understand the tax code he helped write well enough to know he had to pay taxes on his rental property and Chris Dodd doesn't get the concept that you don't do business as a special friend of someone whose industry you are supposed to oversee and they are two of the brighter bulbs in government. Admittedly, they will - for the most part - be the dummies to H&B's ventriloquists but, hey, that's scary, too. While I haven't a doubt that H&B are both men who - at the very least - verge upon brilliance, I'm not sure I want the country's economy recrafted by the former head of Goldman Sachs and a Princeton professor with no real world experience who apparently sees the 1930s around every corner.
And talk about scary, the plan is already tabbed at $700 bil when - at this moment - most of those who set themselves up as smart enough to know will tell you that part of the problem is we have no idea what the properties underlying these mortgage backed securities are worth. Also, much like homeowners who refuse to sell their houses for what the prices at which they are currently appraised, now that Uncle Sam has said he's in the market, will the various companies that hold MBS try to jack the government? Also, also, if the idea is that we the taxpayers will hold on to this paper until it has a higher valuation doesn't that mean that real estate will have to once again appreciate at a higher than normal rate or are we expecting to be the nation's landlord for far, far into the unforseeable future? Also, also, also, are the Dems going to try to trailer hitch even more bailouts onto the bill in order to make it more palatable to the voters? I mean once you get to $700 bil (not including the previous bailouts for home mortgages as a whole and the $85 billion for AIG, oh, oh, I almost forget Bear Stearns and F&F), you're almost talking about real money here.
Finally, are there any monsters under the bed any scarier than the video on Friday of W telling us that he had been informed of incontrovertible evidence proving the need for this action followed by images of H&B flanked by the congressional leadership who had also just received the same incontrovertible evidence. It has been a while since I've seen the President, the Republicans and the Democrats so united - as I recall it was October 2002.





You know, I don't have the same negative reaction to the run-up to the Iraq war that a lot of people do and I *still* found myself looking at Paulson on TV on Sunday and thinking, "You guys just don't have the political capital to convince me we should do what you want."
And what was the deal with Dodd and Boehner on Sunday telling George S that they couldn't "on Sunday morning" get into specifics about what Paulson had said? Is China threatening to crash our economy if we don't liquidify things? If the IMF on our case? And if it's just really, really bad - depression bad - why can't they tell us? Don't they realize being coy about it just makes us all worry more? Or is that what they want?
As for smart, let's not forget that not for nothing is one of the books on how we got into Vietnam called, "The Best and the Brightest". Smart people can suffer from terrible tunnel vision. I just really wish we weren't being pushed to do this now, now, now.
Reply to this
Thanks for your comments, Elise.
I'm not one of those that thinks I would have known any better what to do with the information presented before that Iraq War than those who were there. I certainly never expected HRC to apologize for making her best judgment of what should have been done; nor do I buy into Senator Obama's stance that he is in the clear because he didn't cast a vote. He wasn't there and, trust me, you can't know what you would have done if you weren't actually there. I do think though that situation should be remembered when considering action in this situation.
I am fearful that we are being stampeded into doing something that will burden our children and grandchildren and on and on and on with debt based on the opinions of two men one of whom was working on Wall Street only two years ago. Also, from what I have heard and read so far, Hank Paulson will have almost unfettered discretion and be subject to very little knowledgeable oversight. Plus, the program is growing like mushrooms after a spring rain. Scary stuff.
Reply to this